| Author |
Message |
Topic: Scrim UO Sun. 7:45 PM eastern |
00b3ff
Replies: 5
Views: 131 |
Forum: General Chat Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2018 10:39 pm Subject: Re: Scrim UO Sun. 7:45 PM eastern |
— Pistazien wrote Is there a scrim tonight???
We had 3 last week. I’m only now looking at the forums since. I can do it but not til 9 pm eastern. Dont think the missus will let me start sooner, as I didn’t plan it in advance this time. Just check vent and the server stats if you can/when you can. |
Topic: Scrim UO Sun. 7:45 PM eastern |
00b3ff
Replies: 5
Views: 131 |
Forum: General Chat Posted: Sun May 27, 2018 9:38 pm Subject: Scrim UO Sun. 7:45 PM eastern |
Scrim UO Sun. 7:45 PM eastern
We'll try. Get on vent before then for finalizing. See the Shout Box. Alll welcome, even ZWolf and Cal.
RedRock |
Topic: Net neutrality |
00b3ff
Replies: 6
Views: 132 |
Forum: General Chat Posted: Fri Dec 15, 2017 2:39 pm Subject: Re: Net neutrality |
The Wall Street Journal has a short excellent analysis of the reasons why "Neutrality" should (and did) go away: "The Internet is Free Again." http://tinyurl.com/y9qghftn
By The Editorial Board Dec. 14, 2017 7:23 p.m. ET 423 COMMENTS
Disney’s deal announced Thursday to buy some premium 21st Century Fox properties for $52.4 billion underscores how technology is remaking the media landscape. This discomfits some, but the Federal Communications Commission is right to let markets steer competition and innovation.
The FCC on Thursday voted 3-2 to approve chairman Ajit Pai’s plan to repeal “net neutrality” rules backed by the Obama Administration that reclassified internet-service providers as common carriers under Title II of the Communications Act of 1934. Title II prohibits “any unjust or unreasonable discrimination in charges, practices, classifications, regulations, facilities, or services.”
By effectively deeming the internet a utility, former chairman Tom Wheeler turned the FCC into a political gatekeeper. The rules prohibited broadband providers from blocking, throttling and favoring content, which Mr. Wheeler ostensibly intended to help large content providers like Google and Netflix gain leverage against cable companies.
But as always in politics, treatment under the rules would depend on ideology and partisanship. Even as liberals howl that the Justice Department’s lawsuit to block AT&T’s merger with Time Warner is motivated by President Trump’s animus to CNN, they want FCC control over the internet. The left’s outcry at Mr. Pai “killing” internet freedom has been so overwrought that the FCC meeting room had to be cleared Thursday for a security threat.
Bans on throttling content may poll well, but the regulations have created uncertainty about what the FCC would or wouldn’t allow. This has throttled investment. Price discrimination and paid prioritization are used by many businesses. Netflix charges higher prices to subscribers who stream content on multiple devices. Has this made the internet less free?
Mr. Pai’s rules would require that broadband providers disclose discriminatory practices. Thus cable companies would have to be transparent if they throttle content when users reach a data cap or if they speed up live sports programming. Consumers can choose broadband providers and plans accordingly. The Federal Trade Commission will have authority to police predatory and monopolistic practices, as it had prior to Mr. Wheeler’s power grab. ***
Mr. Pai’s net-neutrality rollback will also support growth in content. Both content producers and consumers will benefit from increased investment in faster wireless and fiber technology. Apple is pouring $1 billion into original content to compete with Amazon, Netflix and YouTube.
Disney is buying the 21st Century Fox assets to compete with Netflix and other streaming services, build leverage with cable companies and establish a global footprint. Netflix has more than 47 million international subscribers and streams in nearly every country. Fox (which shares the Murdoch family’s ownership with our parent company, News Corp.) will keep its news and main sports channels, which can offer “live” content to consumers. The antitrust concerns should be negligible.
Consumers will also benefit from the slow breakdown of the cable monopoly as they customize “bundles” like Hulu or a Disney stream that may cost less. Americans will also enjoy new distribution options, which could have been barred by the net-neutrality rules.
This week T-Mobile announced its acquisition of Layer3 TV, a Denver startup that streams high-definition channels online and will compete with AT&T’s DirecTV Now. Verizon Wireless last month said it will start delivering high-speed broadband to homes over its wireless network late next year. Google and AT&T are experimenting with similar services that will be cheaper than digging dirt to lay cable. This could be a boon for rural America.
By the way, Google has vigorously promoted net neutrality in theory but less in practice. While Google says it remains “committed to the net neutrality policies,” the search engine uses opaque algorithms to prioritize and discriminate against content, sometimes in ways that undercut competitors. Net neutrality for thee, but not me. Google ought to be transparent about its practices.
Technology and markets change faster than the speed of regulation, which Ajit Pai’s FCC has recognized by taking a neutral position and restoring the promise of internet freedom.
Appeared in the December 15, 2017, print edition.
|
Topic: Net neutrality |
00b3ff
Replies: 6
Views: 132 |
Forum: General Chat Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2017 3:11 pm Subject: Re: Net neutrality |
Here's a good discussion on the anti-"neutrality" stance. http://dailycaller.com/2017/12/08/roger-stone-time-for-real-net-neutrality/ |
Topic: Net neutrality |
00b3ff
Replies: 6
Views: 132 |
Forum: General Chat Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 5:29 pm Subject: Re: Net neutrality |
There are two sides to this issue. Here is just an excerpt from one source:
. . . since 2015, when the Obama-era “Net Neutrality” rules were put in place, instances of blocking and censoring have only occurred at a rapid pace on platforms owned by Facebook, Google and Twitter, which all lobbied hard for the 2015 “Net Neutrality” rules, which were carefully crafted so as to not touch those companies.
The implementation of these 2015 Obama-era “Net neutrality” regulations, which were heavily pushed by Google in hundreds of closed-door meetings at the Obama White House, carved out Google and the other Silicon Valley behemoths and secured their position as absolute information gatekeepers.
Since these 2015 regulations passed, Internet giant portals like Google, Facebook, and Twitter have moved to become the judge, jury, and executioner of the contact we read on the Internet, under the guise of eliminating “fake news.”
Federal Trade Commission Acting Chairman Maureen Ohlhausen agreed with (FCC Chairman Ajit) Pai that repealing “Net Neutrality” rules would allow market forces to dictate a broader range of ISP services with varying data and pricing policies that she believes will be more responsive to consumer needs.
“The Federal Trade Commission has tools that can protect consumers online more effectively than the Federal Communications Commission,” she argued, stressing that the FCC regulating the Internet as a Title II utility lacked the regulatory authority the FTC has regulating the Internet under trade provisions to protect Internet privacy and to prevent the censorship of ideas and users on ideological grounds."
https://www.infowars.com/twitter-allows-death-threats-against-fcc-chair-ahead-of-net-neutrality-vote/
You might not like the source (infowars.com) but I've heard and read this from many conservative sources, including back when it was being forced on us by Obama, and lately from Rush and others.
I'm all for regulating, if it's regulating Google, Facebook, Twitter, and other anti-free speech sites. Net "Neutrality" is anything but neutral, and needs to go. IMHO of course. |
Topic: Thinking about a scrim..... |
00b3ff
Replies: 5
Views: 67 |
Forum: Sign up Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2017 8:36 pm Subject: Re: Thinking about a scrim..... |
I would be I'll be out of town 11/21 through 11/27.
And I'm sorry I suggested we go over and do a COD4 "scrim" the last time we got together for a UO scrim. It just didn't work, from my perspective. Sorry |
Topic: My Application for Mensa was approved! |
00b3ff
Replies: 11
Views: 131 |
Forum: General Chat Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2017 3:40 pm Subject: Re: My Application for Mensa was approved! |
| Which test was it you took, and what kind of minimum score did the Mensa bunch need? |
Topic: October 21, 2017 Replay....Scrim |
00b3ff
Replies: 4
Views: 51 |
Forum: Sign up Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2017 3:33 pm Subject: Re: October 21, 2017 Replay....Scrim |
| I'm in. |
Topic: A Engineer Joke |
00b3ff
Replies: 4
Views: 92 |
Forum: Funny Posted: Wed Oct 18, 2017 5:26 pm Subject: Re: A Engineer Joke |
| vista, i recognized your voice as the engineer! |
Topic: October 14 2017 |
00b3ff
Replies: 8
Views: 109 |
Forum: Sign up Posted: Wed Oct 18, 2017 5:23 pm Subject: Re: October 14 2017 |
| Cyco is fine, and she's been on our vent. |
Topic: October 14, 2017 uo scrim results |
00b3ff
Replies: 2
Views: 48 |
Forum: Scrim Results Posted: Wed Oct 18, 2017 5:20 pm Subject: Re: October 14, 2017 uo scrim results |
| Sorry I missed it. |
Topic: Dui-clan.net |
00b3ff
Replies: 3
Views: 55 |
Forum: General Chat Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2017 2:18 am Subject: Re: Dui-clan.net |
I will check when I get back in town late next week. Red |
Topic: October 14 2017 |
00b3ff
Replies: 8
Views: 109 |
Forum: Sign up Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2017 2:16 am Subject: Re: October 14 2017 |
Thank you, Sarge. I really appreciate the 5-map scrim. Unfortunately, I will be out of town then, going to Arizona for a week-long educational course, so I'll have to miss. I will be available the following Sat., though, hint hint. Y'all enjoy! Red |
Topic: Auburn Mystery Alumnus |
00b3ff
Replies: 5
Views: 74 |
Forum: General Chat Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2017 8:10 pm Subject: Re: Auburn Mystery Alumnus |
| But seriously, you got a college yearbook? How many graduates and students were there? I knew a handful of people in my university, mostly those from my high school or in my majors, and that's it. Just way too many students (20K+ undergrad, as I recall) at my state university to even consider putting out a yearbook, i figured, so I didn't even enquire if there was one. And I didn't go to the humongus graduation ceremony, either! |
Topic: Auburn Mystery Alumnus |
00b3ff
Replies: 5
Views: 74 |
Forum: General Chat Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2017 8:05 pm Subject: Re: Auburn Mystery Alumnus |
| He looked a little light in the loafers even then! |
| |